Toxicity of calcium phosphate bions for aortic adventitia in rats

Authors

  • D. K. Shishkova Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
  • E. A. Velikanova Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
  • E. O. Krivkina Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
  • A. V. Mironov Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Yu. A. Kudryavtseva Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
  • A. G. Kutikhin Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Keywords:

atherosclerosis, bions, nanoparticles, toxicity, endothelium, intimal hyperplasia

Abstract

Aim: To investigate whether calcium phosphate bions (CPB) induce adventitial inflammation.
Material and Methods. Toxicity of spherical calcium phosphate bions (CPBS), needle-shaped calcium phosphate bions (CPBN), and magnesium phosphate bions (MPB) for aortic intima of Wistar rats was assessed by intravenous administration immediately upon the angioplasty. After 5 weeks, rats were sacrificed, and injured aortic segments were then examined utilizing hematoxylin and eosin staining.
Results. In contrast to CPBS and CPBN, MPB did not provoke intimal hyperplasia. Neointima formation was induced by both mechanical injury and endothelial toxicity of CPB. This also triggered adventitial inflammation as demonstrated by an increased count of lymphoid-like follicles.
Conclusion. Intravenous administration of CPB after the balloon injury caused intimal hyperplasia of rat abdominal aortas and stimulated the formation of adventitial lymphoid-like follicles. This points on the association between CPB endothelial toxicity and adventitial inflammation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2018-09-25

How to Cite

Shishkova D. K., Velikanova E. A., Krivkina E. O., Mironov A. V., Kudryavtseva Y. A., Kutikhin A. G. Toxicity of calcium phosphate bions for aortic adventitia in rats // The Journal of Atherosclerosis and Dyslipidemias. 2018. VOL. № 3 (32). PP. 37–43.

Issue

Section

Original research paper

Most read articles by the same author(s)